This is really the crux of the matter. Most people, most of the time, are allowing algorithms to force-feed them an information diet. If that is you, you are giving away your agency.
I can't quite remember if I read this piece back in the day. But I got back to it on a recent dive into Cory's materials, which then made me wonder if he had written about how he approaches writing.
I really wish I understood more of computer science, and also had some practical experience programming. It seems to be an intellectually fascinating field.
I am afraid this is purely performative. While I can't judge the exact technical limitations of the approach, Anthropic themselves are already pretty cautious on what to promise.
I have to think about this regularly: what I can't fully wrap my head around is how people are not learning all sorts of things using LLMs. And that is setting aside every problem that comes with AI.
The genie trope doubles as a lesson in specification. AI delegation is an old problem with a new twist: unlimited wishes, no memory, and decomposition as the suddenly scarce skill.
All of this is true and that's why it's funny. The efficiencies that are currently possible and happening, which of course is the underlying punchline of the sketch, are mind-blowing.
If expert AI users still need to assemble clean little operating environments around frontier agents, what hope do we have for mass knowledge worker adoption?
The grifters and the hucksters and the influencers selling impossible things succeed because audiences reward certainty and punish doubt. They honor confidence and resist complication.